Topgrading Tips (Vol 4, No. 4) Americans Are Unethical in Getting Jobs
April 23rd, 2009 . by Brad SmartOur society is in need of an ethical transplant. Why? Because it’s widely considered acceptable for job candidates to lie on their resumes and in hiring interviews. Employers, job seekers, and our economy suffer. Topgrading seeks to eliminate the BS.
INTRODUCTION
Many publishers have asked me to write the book, How to BS (my initials, get it?) Your Way Through a Topgrading Interview. No way! Topgraders elicit TRUTH from candidates.
I guess I have the creds to discuss ethics in hiring, since I’ve performed 65,000 oral case studies. Really! I’ve conducted about 6,500 in-depth interviews of pre-screened, mostly A player candidates for mid-to-executive jobs. In the Topgrading Interview I ask why you left the job, how you got the next job, and how it worked out (in detail).
Since my interviewees averaged 10 jobs, that’s 65,000 times I’ve heard how really sharp people manage their career and get jobs – and how they prepared their resume and rehearsed for interviews.
Heads of companies that verify resumes say almost all resumes include hype, and more than 50% contain deliberate, serious falsehoods. A players are at a real disadvantage, because they can honestly claim lots of accomplishments, yet C players dishonestly do the same. Almost all resumes look like A player resumes!
Caught lying, candidates say they are justified because 1. Companies are not necessarily ethical in how they fill jobs (a topic for a different Topgrading Tips), 2. Outplacement counselors tell them they HAVE to lie to get a job, 3. All the books on job hunting say to lie, and besides, 4. Everyone else is doing it — “Playing the job hunting game is just part of our culture.”
Great! The sad fact is that all 4 points have some truth, and so omitting important truths in resumes and interviews is widely acceptable – unethical, dishonest, but acceptable in our culture.
We Americans sometimes act superior to other countries, where business people are said to mean “no” when they say “yes,” or where written contracts seem to be frequently broken. But those same countries make a point that their culture is not so different from ours in the acceptance of marginal ethics, at least in hiring. The example I always hear is, “It’s perfectly okay in the US for job seekers to lie on their resume and in job interviews.”
Is the culture of job hunting dishonesty really so pervasive? Yes. Outplacement companies don’t admit the teach their clients to lie, but more than a dozen outplacement counselors have told me they ALL do it.
Look at the job seeking section of any bookstore and the message is – “BS your way into a job.” The gentle form of our ethical lapse is the advice to hype positives and exclude negatives, and on my desk at the moment are 15 books with sample “scripts” on how to answer interview questions. The message is clear – it’s ok to BS!
Some books don’t beat around the bush. In 44 Insider Secrets That Will Get You Hired author Cynthia Shapiro’s Secret #7 is: You CAN Lie on Your Resume. Secret #31 is: Don’t Ever Admit You Were Fired. She suggests that in your resume and in interviews it’s okay to deceive – for example, to not mention a 3-to 6-month job in which you were fired. Instead, she advises you to say you were conducting an extended job search.
The job hunting books give liars comfort that they won’t be caught. Why? Most companies are so fearful of being sued, they prohibit managers from accepting reference calls. Job hunting books take glee in the fact that former bosses won’t be contacted and they advise job seekers to provide only the most positive references – golfing buddies, insurance agents, neighbors, and priests (okay, I’m exaggerating a bit).
CONSEQUENCES ARE HORRIBLE
With job seekers reading these books on how to out-interview interviewers, putting their best foot forward and concealing negatives, everyone loses except some C players who otherwise would have to take much lower-paying jobs.
You’ve read our studies – hiring managers like you experience only 25% high performers hired, so your job performance suffers. Or, more likely, you work 70 hours per week to sweep up after mis-hires, sacrificing your personal life.
Companies perform poorer with 75% mis-hires, and the mis-hired employees frequently bounce from job to job. The cost of mis-hires in our economy has been estimated in the trillions of dollars.
In short, like Chicago politicians who take payoffs (“beause dat’s da way we do tings here”), job seekers deliberately deceive prospective employers, like you.
Can we change this rotten, destructive aspect of our culture.? We can try …
TOPGRADING CREATES ETHICS
In a steadily growing wave of culture change, Topgraders, almost all of whom are A players are making our society more ethical, and just about everyone wins. Topgrading is all about TRUTH in advertising when it comes to resume construction, and all about TRUTH in answering interview questions.
With honestly documented 90% hiring success, Topgrading managers perform better and have balance in life, their employers are more profitable and grow more jobs, and our economy benefits. And the society at large is ore productive, creating more jobs and wealth.
But what about the C players who aren’t hired? They must find jobs where they can perform at a more high level, even if the level of the job isn’t as high.
How do Topgraders create more honest job seekers? You probably know this, but Topgraders begin by letting candidates know that THEY will have to arrange personal reference calls with bosses, in order to get a job offer. This Threat of Reference Check (TORC) Technique inspires honesty. If works! C players drop out (they can’t get former bosses to talk) and A players are happy to arrange those calls. Most important – candidates willing to make those calls are super honest in interviews, knowing you’ll be talking with their bosses.
FEATURED PRODUCT:  For a free Cost of Mis-Hires Form (to easily measure the costs of mis-hires), just (click here). And if you’d like a 1-hour short course in Topgrading hiring, including the methods that inspire honesty and ethics in the process, (click here).



I recently had a conversation (with myself) about how natural it is for people to lie, cheat, steal, and slander. Imagine being a prospect on the wrong end of that. Unfortunately, hiring managers do the same during interviews. Making the bad appear good and the good appear better is an accepted practice in hiring. All managers want A players, yet only 20% of candidates meet Top Grading criteria. As a result, many managers will polish the pewter until it shines like silver. Bad on both sides of the hiring process.
Im finding that more and more applicants are not disclosing a background issue, and other downright lies on their resume. This leaves me looking like a fool to my client when their background comes back with a felony or misdemenor and they have already started a position. I dig and dig, but still get lies. I can do reference checks, but can’t run a background on every candidate I see.
Brad - we’ve been your customer for years and thanks for helping us become a rigorous and relentless topgrader and an employer of A-players. Your T-Tip 4.4 on ethics and resume embellishments hits home. I can’t tell you how much of a problem this is. We conduct extensive reference checks and background investigations and the liars still slip through once in a while. A few years ago we fired a 50+ year old when our BI process revealed that he in fact did not have the degree that he’d been claiming to possess on his resume for the last 30 years! Upon confronting him, he confessed and admitted that he’s simply gotten away with it and felt he could continue getting the financial advantages of a degree without having made the complete effort to earn one. We fired him on the spot. Our company will not tolerate liars…and there are tons of them out there. How we have become a society that basically accepts this as standard practice is beyond me. Shame on everyone who promotes interview lying, resume embellishment, or those who abide these practices.
Great article…but outraging.